Thursday, May 29, 2025

Trump’s Executive Orders on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion June 3


In January 2025, President Trump signed a series of executive orders aimed at changing governmental approaches to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. These orders seek to end what the administration deems "radical and wasteful" DEI initiatives. The goal is to restore a merit-based system that treats individuals fairly, without favoring anyone based on race or identity. This blog will explain the reasons behind these orders and the potential impacts on society.


One of the main arguments for ending certain DEI programs is to combat what some officials see as illegal discrimination. For instance, critics of these programs believe that initiatives aiming to boost representation based on race overlook the real qualifications of individuals. They argue that every position in government, education, or business should be awarded strictly on merit—that is, based on an individual’s abilities and achievements. As a result, these executive orders aim to create a level playing field where everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed based on their skills.

Moreover, supporters of these executive orders claim that DEI programs can lead to resentment among individuals who feel overlooked or undervalued because of their background. If a job is filled because of DEI preferences rather than talent or experience, it could discourage those who believe they deserved the opportunity. This can create a divide among individuals, as some may feel empowered by DEI while others feel marginalized. By focusing solely on merit, the policies aim to unify and promote a culture based on shared achievements rather than individual backgrounds.

However, it is essential to consider that diversity, equity, and inclusion have valuable goals. Diverse teams can lead to innovative solutions and perspectives that enhance decision-making. They help ensure that government policies consider the needs of all communities, not just a select few. Critics of Trump's executive orders argue that completely abolishing DEI programs could roll back progress made over the years in creating a more inclusive society.


In conclusion, Trump’s executive orders represent a significant shift in how the government views diversity, equity, and inclusion. While the intent is to eliminate discrimination and prioritize merit, it raises critical questions about the role of diversity in society. If implemented, these changes could redefine opportunities for many individuals. It is crucial to find a balance that promotes both merit and diversity, ensuring that everyone has a fair chance to succeed while also benefiting from varied perspectives. This balance is essential for a fair and equitable society.

This article gives more explanation on what is happening.

Tuesday, May 27, 2025

"Other People's Children" May 29

 Lisa Delpit’s book "Other People's Children" addresses critical issues surrounding education, particularly in relation to how cultural differences impact learning. Delpit, an educator and scholar, argues that understanding the backgrounds of students from different cultures is vital for effective teaching. This blog will explore Delpit's main arguments and their relevance to education today.



Delpit emphasizes the importance of cultural awareness when teaching children, especially those from minority backgrounds. She points out that many educators lack the knowledge or skills to connect with students who come from different cultural environments than their own. This disconnect can lead to misunderstandings and failures in the classroom. For instance, a teacher who does not recognize the cultural significance of storytelling in a student's background may dismiss a student's contributions as irrelevant. Delpit argues that acknowledging and integrating these cultural elements into teaching practices can create a more inclusive and effective learning environment.

Delpit also advocates for the need to teach what she calls "codes of power," which refers to the skills and knowledge that students need to succeed in society. She argues that it is crucial for educators to not only teach academic content but also to equip students with the social and cultural tools necessary to navigate the wider world. This idea resonates with current educational reforms that emphasize social-emotional learning alongside traditional subjects.

In conclusion, Lisa Delpit’s "Other People’s Children" remains a significant text in discussions about education today. By emphasizing the importance of cultural understanding, addressing biases, and teaching essential life skills, Delpit provides valuable insights into how educators can better serve all students. In an increasingly diverse society, her arguments encourage teachers to adapt their methods and expectations to create a more equitable educational landscape for every child, ensuring that all students have the opportunity to succeed.

Here is another piece of work by Lisa Delpit that I found interesting.

Friday, May 23, 2025

Colorblindness is the New Racism

 In recent years, the concept of colorblindness has emerged as a significant topic of discussion surrounding race, privilege, and discrimination. The phrase "colorblindness is the new racism" suggests that while people may claim to see everyone as equal, this attitude often overlooks the real and systemic issues of racial inequality. By examining the work of scholars like Margalynne J. Armstrong and Stephanie M. Wildman in "Colorblindness is the New Racism," as well as Allan G. Johnson’s "Privilege, Power, and Difference," we can better understand how colorblindness can actually perpetuate racism and contribute to the misunderstanding of privilege.




Colorblindness, at its core, is the belief that one should ignore or not acknowledge race. While it may sound appealing to treat everyone equally regardless of their skin color, this view misses the complexities of racial issues. Armstrong and Wildman argue that ignoring race does not eliminate racism; instead, it allows existing prejudices and systemic inequalities to persist without challenge. For instance, in recent discussions about police brutality, many people claim that race should not matter when addressing crime. However, this perspective often silences the unique experiences of marginalized communities who face disproportionate rates of violence. By adopting a colorblind stance, individuals may unknowingly support a system that maintains inequity.

Moreover, Johnson's exploration of privilege adds another layer to the conversation. He emphasizes that many people benefit from societal structures based on race without realizing it. White individuals, for example, may not encounter the same barriers as people of color in education, employment, or interactions with law enforcement. Recognizing these privileges does not mean feeling guilty for being white; rather, it is about understanding how these advantages influence societal dynamics and supporting efforts to create equity for all.

To illustrate this, consider recent discussions surrounding the hiring process in various industries. Reports have shown that job applicants with traditionally white-sounding names receive more callbacks than those with names that reflect a different racial or ethnic background, even when qualifications are identical. This discrimination highlights how colorblindness can ignore the critical importance of acknowledging race in combating unjust practices.

In conclusion, while the intent behind colorblindness may be to foster equality, it often serves to perpetuate existing racial injustices and ignores the realities of privilege. By recognizing the complexities of race and privilege, as discussed by Armstrong, Wildman, and Johnson, we can foster a deeper understanding of societal issues. Instead of claiming to be colorblind, acknowledging race and the privileges that come with it can lead to more meaningful conversations about equality and justice. Only then can we hope to create a society that genuinely values diversity and promotes equity for all.

Thursday, May 22, 2025

Privilege, Power, and Difference


     Privilege, Power, and Difference by Allan G. Johnson was a lengthy read but the message is strong. It is easy to move through life with the privileges we haven't earned without a second thought. I don't always think about the struggles others are forced to face because of these invisible advantages. As Johnson states, "All of us are part of the problem. But we could also make ourselves part of the solution." 

    According to Johnson, topics like racism and sexism are very real yet many are afraid to speak on the subjects for fear of being too vulnerable or maybe because of guilt. I never felt I was at a disadvantage because I am a female but reading this article has opened my eyes to such an imbalance. For me, this is small in my opinion to those facing disadvantages due to race, socioeconomic status, and sexual orientation, to name a few. 


    Per Johnson, "Clearly, we aren't getting along with one another, and we need to ask why not." He feels that individuals fear the unknown or unfamiliar. It is so difficult for some to accept any sexual orientation, other than heterosexual. Or that a man is in control, or more dominating than a woman, or that a gay man isn't a real man. None of these statements are true but society feels they are.

    It is easier said than done, but we need to rip off the band-aid and do something about the injustices our society functions with. It's ok to admit what we don't know and to talk about hard topics. I agree with the message Johnson relays, that things aren't going to change until we all make a conscious effort to change them. 

    I really enjoyed reading Sam's blog on this topic and the way she depicted the differences in beliefs of what privilege means, stating, "Growing up, we are taught that privilege is a good thing that is earned or rewarded. For example, it's a privilege to get your license when you turn 16 or it's a privilege to stay up past your bedtime." This is how I felt about the word itself. This article has clarified the meaning of the word in how it affects people in the real world.

    Johnson argues that "just as privilege tends to open doors of opportunity, oppression tends to slam them shut."

Tuesday, May 20, 2025


Welcome to my first blog! I am a school nurse,wife, and mother of three children, two boys and a girl. I enjoy spending time with my family and taking small road trips. I am an animal lover and have a black lab named Larry and three cats, Milo, Arlo, and Levi. They are my peace after a busy day. I work for a middle school in Providence but I am moving to a high school next year. I finished my bachelor's last month and I am just starting my journey through the School Nurse Teacher certification program. I'm looking forward to learning more in this course.





 


Slide Show

Slide Show